Relatives' Distress Over Coastal Erosion Threatening Norfolk Burial Sites
Families whose relatives buried in graves vulnerable to coastal erosion argue that indecision over how to tackle the issue is creating avoidable anguish concerning the eternal homes of their loved ones.
An Impending Threat to Ancient Graveyards
Local authorities have singled out three burial grounds in the villages of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being in danger of being engulfed by the ocean in the coming decades.
A recent report on the situation details a series of possible actions, from taking no action to exhuming remains and relocating them in more secure sites. Authorities maintain it is for the community to determine how to proceed.
“At the moment we’re in a state of uncertainty. It causes me distress. My parents wanted this to be their final resting place, but it won't be because of the sea.”
Projections suggest at least part of one graveyard could fall into the waves in the next 80 years, but some residents worry it will happen much sooner. “I think it’s got under 20 years, if you look at what’s happened in the last 30 years,” one said.
Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles
A local business owner recalled a childhood visit to the neighbouring settlement of Eccles, which has almost entirely disappeared into the water, along with its place of worship and burial ground.
“You could see human remains,” she said. “Some have this idealized notion that people’s remains will just get carried away to the ocean. That is not the case. People will collect remains as mementos and go grave robbing in search of treasures. That is completely undignified.”
“I fear that the identical fate that befell at Eccles will happen here and there’ll be bones on the beach. I would feel appalled by that.”
A Soldier's Grave in Peril
Along the coast lies the burial plot of a former paratrooper who died while serving overseas. His parent said she could not sleep after discovering her child's grave might one day be moved.
“It truly trouble me to think this won’t be his lasting resting place,” she said. “To our family it’s an significant site to visit.”
She believes, new burials should cease but says it is premature to exhume current plots. “My preference for now is to take no action and watch carefully, but an early decision needs to be made when a critical moment has been reached.”
Searching for Solutions and Certainty
The lack of consensus over the timing and method to tackle the problem has left bereaved families feeling exasperated and anxious.
Several families want additional sea defences to slow the unavoidable loss and to allow burials to continue for now. Different voices contend the time for moving graves is drawing near.
“It is very emotive,” a family member stated. “The council’s report was thorough, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is implemented. And everybody is washing their hands over who is accountable.”
A local official said the graveyards were under the care of the church authorities. “In the end it is up to them to choose the path to take. We are here to assist them through that journey with residents.”
It was also stated there was time to consider all the options. “This concerns many years before it starts to be lost.”
“Currently, there exists no common view on what should be done yet. We need good local conversations to discover the appropriate answers for each village.”
The possibility of the loss of the churches and graveyards was described as one of “profound sorrow for the area,” but church representatives also referenced a doctrine in life after death, offering a theological viewpoint on the temporal disappearance of hallowed earth.